Wikipedia
tells me that there is a difference between predestination and
omniscience - that the former is mostly religious, and it implies God
not only knows what will happen (omniscience), but had an active role
in choosing things to be so. Arguably, if God did create the universe,
then his omniscience would imply predestination... unless God didn't
intend certain things? But that paints a very unconcerned God, and I
don't think that's what most people want.
Anyway, the
topic of fate and destiny came up back in June in conversation with
some friends. I've been asked to write about this, but I never found
the motivation to do so until now.
First, I want to
state my belief that history is repeatable. That is, for some paste
event, if the same person (in name as well as in time) was put in the
same place at the same time, the same things would happen. This is not
really a statement about fate, since the person has some freedom to
choose what happens, or alternately their "choice" is already
determined. This does say something about human behavior though;
underneath this statement is an assumption that humans, if put in the
same situation, will behave in the same way. That is, a person's
beliefs together with the environment can directly predict a person's
actions.
This may seem like a very deterministic view
of life, but as I've said, that is not the case. Although human action
will lead to the next timestep of beliefs and environment, nothing says
this is a closed system. The environment may change without human
intervention, as it has done so for millions of years before man
arrived on the planet. More important, even with free will actions can
be deterministic. For example, if a person is in a room and there's a
fire, it is almost certain that person will run towards the door. Of
course, he has the choice of choosing to stay, of even leap into the
fire, but under normal circumstances that won't happen.
I
think more interesting is the question of where free will comes from.
Macroscopic physics is largely deterministic;given the positions and
velocities of air molecules, for example, and the momentum and position
of a coin, it's probably possible to calculate how it will land. Only
on the very small scale is there something that's random: atomic decay.
There is a question of whether something as impersonal as quantum
mechanics really means free will. But my problem with random atomic
decay has more to do with the definition of random. What appears random
to us may not in fact be non-deterministic. Kolmogorov complexity
(a course which I dropped) defines a random string as something which
cannot be compressed; that is, there is no shorter description of the
string than the string itself. Given this definition, it is conceivable
that there is a book with the result of every coin toss recorded, and
coin tosses merely follow this book in results. The string would be
random (incompressible), but the results would actually be
deterministic. Parallels can be drawn to a "random number generator"
where the numbers are defined before hand by coin toss. The sequence
generated are random, but you know the sequence before hand. Something
like this.
Besides
this free-will, determinism, and predestination thing being unknowable,
it is irrelevant. Even if we are predestined to do things, we cannot
know what that thing is until we actually do them. For us, it doesn't
matter if the future is predetermined or is undecided; we won't know
either way. You might think you are destined to change the
world, and so lie on the couch all day waiting for that to happen.
That, of course, won't help you change the world, and it might
contribute a lot to proving you thought incorrectly. We therefore have
no choice to be reject predesination/determisn, and try our hardest to
do what we want, because this will give us the best "chance" of getting
there. Even if the chance has always been none.
So do
I believe in predestination? No. It's not provable, and since we can't
use it to do other things, it's not helpful either (accept in faith).
Kinda like the existance of God, actually, now I think about it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
No comments
Post a Comment